Comments on: Whew. https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/ The raw writings of a real pastor. Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:10:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40 By: ch https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/#comment-665 Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:54:33 +0000 http://www.wanderingshepherd.org/?p=676#comment-665 maybe

]]> By: vernon https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/#comment-664 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:15:58 +0000 http://www.wanderingshepherd.org/?p=676#comment-664 so then shouldn’t it be data supports instead of data support?

]]> By: ch https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/#comment-663 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:58:43 +0000 http://www.wanderingshepherd.org/?p=676#comment-663 da·ta
   [dey-tuh, dat-uh, dah-tuh] Show IPA
noun
1.
a plural of datum.

Ain’t nuthin worse than an Okie smart***

]]> By: vernon https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/#comment-661 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:11:19 +0000 http://www.wanderingshepherd.org/?p=676#comment-661 Make sure your Karma does not run over your Dogma!

]]> By: vernon https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/#comment-660 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:09:27 +0000 http://www.wanderingshepherd.org/?p=676#comment-660 Isn’t the plural if data Datum?

]]> By: ch https://www.wanderingshepherd.org/2011/12/19/whew/#comment-657 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:19:44 +0000 http://www.wanderingshepherd.org/?p=676#comment-657 , “The fundamental dogma that define our denomination are intact and without question.” Without question what? Without question enigmatic and obscure? Without question stupefyingly dull and boring. Without question sensual and stimulating. Perhaps if they were to employ English.

(I know that “dogma” is plural but flaunting the fact is just a wee bit pretentious in this Okie’s ever-so-humble opinion. On the other hand, if the data support such usage – - -.)

]]>